INVESTIGATING ANTIGENIC FEATURES OF THE SARS-CoV-2 ISOLATED IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN 2021-2022 BY HYPERIMMUNE MOUSE SERUM NEUTRALISATION.

Introduction. The rapid spread of a new coronavirus infection among populations in many countries worldwide has contributed to the genetic evolution of the virus, resulting in the emergence of multiple genetic variants of the SARSCoV-2 coronavirus. Mutations in the viral genome can affect the ability of the virus to bypass the immune system and complicate development of diagnostic and prophylactic drugs. Data on the neutralizing activity of the sera obtained against previously circulating genetic variants of the virus in relation to current SARS-CoV-2 strains may serve as a scientific basis for the selection of the antigens in vaccine development. The aim of this work was to study cross-reactivity of SARSCoV-2 coronavirus strains belonging to different genetic variants, which were isolated in the territory of the Russian Federation during 2020-2022 in the neutralization reaction using mouse hyperimmune sera. Materials and methods. Ten strains of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus belonging to different genetic variants were used (three non-VOC strains, alpha, beta, gamma, delta, delta+AY, omicron 1 and omicron 2). The hCoV-19/Australia/VIC01/2020 strain (Wuhan) was included in the study as a prototypical variant. BALBc mice were immunized with inactivated concentrated antigen mixed with a 1:1 adjuvant, which was a virus-like immunostimulatory complex based on Quillaja saponaria (Quillaja saponaria). The antibody titer was determined in the neutralization reaction. Results. Essential decrease of neutralizing ability of antibodies specific to non-vOC genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus was revealed against beta VOC and to a lesser degree against alpha and gamma VOC variants. The differences in the neutralizing activity level of antibodies for alpha and beta VOC variants are not significant among themselves, and with gamma VOC variants - there are no significant differences. Neutralizing ability of antibodies specific to delta VOC against alpha and beta VOC variants decreased 4-fold. Neutralizing activity of sera obtained to omicron 1 and 2 variants in relation to the prototype coronavirus variant was reduced 18-fold, to the gamma variant - 12-fold, to delta variants - more than 30-fold;for other variants it was even lower. Conclusions. The results obtained testify to the presence of cross-reactivity between strains of coronavirus belonging to genetic lines Wuhan, alpha, beta, gamma;it is weaker for delta variants. Mutations in the genome of VOC omicron variants led to a significant decrease in antigenic cross-links with earlier genetic variants of the coronavirus. These findings explain the low efficacy of vaccines based on the Wuhan strain, synthetic immunogens, and recombinant proteins based on it against omicron VOC variants, which have caused a rise in morbidity since early 2022, as well as cases of re-infection of humans with new genetic variants of the coronavirus.Copyright © 2023 Saint Petersburg Pasteur Institute. All rights reserved.

mRNA versus inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccines in multiple sclerosis: Humoral responses and protectivity-Does it matter?

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Adequate humoral responses are obtained in pwMS receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) after vaccination, with the exception of those receiving B-cell-depleting therapies and non-selective S1P modulators. However, most of the reported studies on the immunity of COVID-19 vaccinations have included mRNA vaccines, and information on inactivated virus vaccine responses, long-term protectivity, and comparative studies with mRNA vaccines are very limited. Here, we aimed to investigate the association between humoral vaccine responses and COVID-19 infection outcomes following mRNA and inactivated virus vaccines in a large national cohort of pwMS receiving DMTs. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional and prospective multicenter study on COVID-19-vaccinated pwMS. Blood samples of pwMS with or without DMTs and healthy controls were collected after two doses of inactivated virus (Sinovac) or mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccines. PwMS were sub-grouped according to the mode of action of the DMTs that they were receiving. SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers were evaluated by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. A representative sample of this study cohort was followed up for a year. COVID-19 infection status and clinical outcomes were compared between the mRNA and inactivated virus groups as well as among pwMS subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 1484 pwMS (1387 treated, 97 untreated) and 185 healthy controls were included in the analyses (male/female: 544/1125). Of those, 852 (51.05%) received BioNTech, and 817 (48.95%) received Sinovac. mRNA and inactivated virus vaccines result in similar seropositivity; however, the BioNTech vaccination group had significantly higher antibody titers (7.175±10.074) compared with the Sinovac vaccination group (823±1.774) (p<0.001). PwMS under ocrelizumab, fingolimod, and cladribine treatments had lower humoral responses compared with the healthy controls in both vaccine types. After a mean of 327±16 days, 246/704 (34.9%) of pwMS who were contacted had COVID-19 infection, among whom 83% had asymptomatic or mild disease. There was no significant difference in infection rates of COVID-19 between participants vaccinated with BioNTech or Sinovac vaccines. Furthermore, regression analyses show that no association was found regarding age, sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale score (EDSS), the number of vaccination, DMT type, or humoral antibody responses with COVID-19 infection rate and disease severity, except BMI Body mass index (BMI). CONCLUSION: mRNA and inactivated virus vaccines had similar seropositivity; however, mRNA vaccines appeared to be more effective in producing SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. B-cell-depleting therapies fingolimod and cladribine were associated with attenuated antibody titer. mRNA and inactive virus vaccines had equal long-term protectivity against COVID-19 infection regardless of the antibody status.

CRISPR Technology and Its Importance in SARS-CoV-2 Treatment

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) predominantly affects the respiratory system. The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating effects on the health system and the global economy worldwide. To reduce the worsening impact of the pandemic, various treatment options and vaccines have been developed. Despite these efforts the pandemic could not be stopped because of the single-stranded nature of the virus combined with the lack of proof-reading abilities of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). This results in a high probability of error in the copying process and consequently, mutations occur. The increase in mutations in SARS-CoV-2 reduced the efficacy of antiviral medicines and vaccines. To fight this problem, studies were conducted on the efficacy and safety of using Clustered Regularly Interspersed Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Initially, discovered in archaea, CRISPR is a gene-editing tool that works by altering specific parts of the genome. In this review, we focused on the efficacy and safety of CRISPR technology in the treatment of COVID-19.Copyright © 2023 Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi. All rights reserved.

Vaccine Development Against SARS-CoV-2: From Virology to Vaccine Clinical Trials

An urgent vaccine development is required against the recent pandemic of a novel coronavi-rus. Currently, there is no approved vaccine against COVID-19. Vaccination is proved to be the most beneficial way to protect humans from infections. Several vaccine candidates have been conducted to different phases of clinical trials, and more vaccine candidates are on the way to enter the trials. Different vaccine types have developed, including inactivated virus vaccines, subunit-based vaccines, adenovi-rus-vector vaccines, DNA-based vaccines, DC-based vaccines, and mRNA-based vaccines. The mRNA-1273 was the first vaccine candidate that started evaluating in the clinical trial. Also, AZD1222 is the first vaccine candidate that started phase II/III of clinical trials. Both of these vaccine candidates were considered as promising vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2. This review aims to overview and share various strategies to develop efficient therapeutic and preventive vaccines based on the origin, bi-ology, structure, and immune-evasion of SARS-CoV-2.Copyright © 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

Risk of Exacerbation of Rheumatic Disease after COVID-19 Vaccination

Objectives: To investigate the risk of flare-ups after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic disease. Method(s): A total of 1,617 patients with rheumatic diseases were identified from three rheumatology clinics. Patients were interviewed for demographic data, disease activity, and vaccination status. Disease flare-up was determined clinically by independent rheumatologists. Change of serum markers and medications were retrieved from medical records. The risk of exacerbation of rheumatic disease, change in serum markers, and escalation of rheumatic medications between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients were determined using Cox, linear, and logistic regression models, respectively. Possible confounding factors were also taken into consideration. Result(s): Among 562 (34.76%) patients who received COVID-19 vaccination, rheumatic disease (HR = 2.10, P < 0.001), inflammatory arthritis (HR = 2.71, P < 0.001), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (HR = 2.03, P = 0.002), spondyloarthritis (SpA) (HR = 4.78, P < 0.001), autoimmune disease (HR = 1.77, P = 0.01), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (HR = 1.99, P = 0.02) were associated with postvaccination clinical flare-up. Adult Still's disease (B = 12.76, P = 0.03) was associated with increased serum C-reactive protein (CRP). No association was found between vaccination and escalation of rheumatic medication. Subgroup analyses showed that only the mRNA vaccine was associated with flare-ups. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 vaccination was associated with minor disease flare-up but not escalation of rheumatic medications. In the absence of absolute contraindications, COVID-19 vaccination is recommended in patients with rheumatic disease. KEY MESSAGES 1. Vaccination is effective in the prevention of morbidity due to COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases. 2. The mRNA vaccine was associated with mild rheumatic disease flare-up. 3. Inactivated virus vaccine is preferable to mRNA vaccine in patients with active autoimmune disease. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).

Reported COVID-19 vaccines side effects among Algerian athletes: a comparison between inactivated virus, adenoviral vector, and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

OBJECTIVES: Many types of COVID19 vaccines are administered globally, yet there is not much evidence regarding their side effects among athletes. This study evaluated the selfreported postvaccination side effects of inactivated virus, adenoviral vector, and mRNA COVID19 vaccines among Algerian athletes. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out in Algeria between March 01 and 4 April 2022. The study used a validated questionnaire with twenty-five multiple-choice items covering the participants' anamnestic characteristics, post-vaccination side effects (their onset and duration), post-vaccination medical care, and risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 273 athletes completed the survey. Overall, (54.6%) of the athletes reported at least one local side effect, while (46.9%) reported at least one systemic side effect. These side effects were more prevalent among the adenoviral vector group compared to the inactivated virus and mRNA groups. The most common local side effect was injection site pain (29.9%), while Fever (30.8%) was the most prevalent systemic side effect. The age group of 31-40 years, allergy, previous infection with COVID-19, and the first dose of vaccines were associated with an increased risk of side effects for all groups of COVID-19 vaccines. Logistic regression analysis further revealed that compared to males, the incidence of reported side effects was significantly higher in females (odd ratio (OR) = 1.16; P = 0.015*) only for the adenoviral vector vaccine group. In addition, a significantly higher percentage of athletes group of high dynamic/moderate static or high dynamic /high static components suffered from post-vaccination side effects compared to the group of athletes with high dynamic/low static components (OR = 14.68 and 14.71; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The adenoviral vector vaccines have the highest rate of side effects, followed by the inactivated virus and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. COVID­19 vaccines were well-tolerated among Algerian athletes and there were no reports of serious side effects. Nevertheless, further long-term follow-up study with a larger sample size of athletes (from different types and sports categories) is warranted to establish the long-term safety of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (asia) in a 71-year- old filipino female after an inactivated virus vaccine: A case report

Background: Autoimmune Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants, or ASIA, suggests certain environmental exposures, including vaccination can cause hyperstimulation of the innate and adaptive immune system leading to production of autoantibodies in a genetically predisposed individual. A diagnosis of exclusion, proposed diagnostic criteria suggested ASIA if specified major and minor criteria are fulfilled. Suspicion for ASIA was raised in our patient due to identified exposure accompanied by typical manifestations not explained by another cause. Case: A 71-year- old Filipino female with controlled hypertension and diabetes, came in due to progressive right eye pain, supraorbital headache, ptosis and limitation of extra-ocular movements for 3 weeks. No blurring of vision, color vision changes, or visual field cuts. She didn't have other systemic features but received 2 doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 1 month (1st) and 1 day (2nd) prior to the symptom onset. The left eye was unremarkable. ESR was elevated (109) with normal CRP. ANA was 1:80 with a speckled pattern. The complements were normal and lupus confirmatory panel was negative. CSF studies showed slightly elevated protein and glucose with no pleiocytosis, IgG level was normal with negative oligoclonal panel and cultures. EMG-NCV showed acute partial incomplete bilateral facial neuropathy. Cranial MRI/MRA showed chronic lacunar infarct in the right corona radiata. The MRI of the orbits showed right optic nerve enhancement with hyperintense nerve sheath compatible with optic neuritis. She underwent pulse IV steroid therapy (Methylprednisolone 1 g) for 3 days and was maintained on oral steroid 1 mg/kg/day. There was minimal improvement of symptoms for which she received intravenous immunoglobulin for 5 days. Her symptoms gradually improved upon discharge. Conclusion(s): Identification of the possible autoimmunity from adjuvants is not to discourage vaccination but rather raise awareness of the need for further studies to screen who might be at risk and to prepare or even develop alternatives, such as vaccines with a different type of adjuvant.

Development and Evaluation of a Novel One-Step RT-qPCR Targeting the Vero Gene for the Identification of False-Positive Results Caused by Inactivated Virus Vaccine Contamination.

To identify false-positive SARS-CoV-2 test results caused by novel coronavirus inactivated vaccine contamination, a novel RT-qPCR targeting the ORF1ab and N genes of SARS-CoV-2 and Vero gene was developed. The amplification efficiency, precision, and lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the RT-qPCR assay were determined. A total of 346 clinical samples and 132 environmental samples were assessed, and the diagnostic performance was evaluated. The results showed that the amplification efficiency of the ORF1ab, N, and Vero genes was 95%, 97%, and 93%, respectively. The coefficients of variation of Ct values at a concentration of 3 × 104 copies/mL were lower than 5%. The LLOD for the ORF1ab, N, and Vero genes reached 8.0, 3.3, and 8.2 copies/reaction, respectively. For the 346 clinical samples, our RT-qPCR assay identified SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative samples with a sensitivity of 100.00% and a specificity of 99.30% and novel coronavirus inactivated vaccine-contaminated samples with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100%. For the environmental samples, our RT-qPCR assay identified novel coronavirus inactivated vaccine-contaminated samples with a sensitivity of 88.06% and a specificity of 95.38%. In conclusion, the RT-qPCR assay we established can be used to diagnose COVID-19 and, to a certain extent, false-positive results due to vaccine contamination.

Evidence synthesis and pooled analysis of vaccine effectiveness for COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 as a heterologous booster after inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccines.

Introduction of primary COVID-19 vaccination has helped reduce severe disease and death caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding the protection conferred by heterologous booster regimens informs alternative vaccination strategies that enable programmatic resilience and can catalyze vaccine confidence and coverage. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are among the most widely used vaccines worldwide. This review synthesizes the available evidence identified as of May 26, 2022, on the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of a heterologous BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine booster dose after an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine primary series, to help protect against COVID-19. Evidence showed that the heterologous BNT16b2 mRNA vaccine booster enhances immunogenicity and improves vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19, and no new safety concerns were identified with heterologous inactivated primary series with mRNA booster combinations.

Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With a History of COVID-19 Infection: A Survey Conducted in Pakistan.

Introduction As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunizations become more common, concerns about their safety and reactogenicity have grown. It is important to assess and analyze the post-vaccination side effects of several COVID-19 vaccines that have been licensed in Pakistan. Methods and results A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2021 and January 2022 to collect data on the side effects produced by different COVID-19 vaccines. An online survey was conducted to gather data on participants' demographics, clinical profiles, COVID-19 profiles as well as the intensity and side effects of COVID-19 vaccines. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to analyze the data collected. Out of 421 participants, 63.2% were males, 36.8% of participants received messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine, 33.2% received viral vector vaccine, 29.9% received inactivated vaccine, and further 71.7% of the total subjects were completely immunized. The majority of the symptoms were mild to moderate in degree. Approximately, 0.7% of the individuals reported experiencing serious adverse effects. Injection site pain (35.9%) was noted to be the most remarkable post-vaccination side effect followed by fever (33.2%) and fatigue (23.1%). Prior COVID-19 infection was not associated with the severity of any COVID-19 vaccine-related side effect (p > 0.05), except dyspnea. Younger participants and the female gender were substantially linked to post-vaccination adverse effects. Conclusion In comparison to viral vector and inactivated vaccines, our data suggest that the mRNA-based vaccination causes more severe adverse effects, and the majority of them were mild to moderate in severity. Participants who had previously contracted COVID-19 were not at a higher risk of developing additional vaccine-related side effects.

Safety and Immunogenicity Outcomes of an Inactivated Viral Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (Covaxin)

Introduction: Bharat Biotech International Ltd in partnership with National Institute of Virology (NIV), has developed an indigenous whole virion inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral vaccine BBV-152 (Covaxin), formulated with Toll Like Receptors 7/8 agonist Imidazoquinoline (IMDG) molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel). Variety of factors other than environmental ones can affect vaccines efficiency outside the strict setting of clinical trials, like how the vaccine is stored or transported, and even how patients are vaccinated. In addition, the intrinsic capacity of the recipient to respond to a vaccine which is determined by sex, genetic factors, age, psychological stress, nutrition and other diseases are also likely to have an impact. Aim(s): To determine the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the inactivated whole virus vaccine (Covaxin) amongst hospital-based population groups. Material(s) and Method(s): The prospective analytical study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India, from January 2021 to March 2021.The study primarily included Healthcare Workers (HCWs) employed at SMS Medical college and attached hospitals. In-vitro quantitative IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) were measured using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) based Advia centaur SARS-CoV-2 IgG, manufactured by Siemens Pvt Ltd, Munich, Germany, as per manufacture's instructions. Result(s): Out of total 223 individuals, 61.88 % (138/223) showed neutralising antibody titre of >1 index value by CLIA, rest 38.12% (85/223) were non reactive i.e., titre <1 index value, after four weeks of receiving first dose of Covaxin. After 2 to 4 weeks of receiving second dose 84.30% (188/223) showed neutralising antibody titre of >1 index value by CLIA, rest 15.70% (35/223) were non reactive i.e., titre <1 index value. After receiving first dose, 100% (223/223) of the participants developed localised pain and bodyache 33.63% (75/223). None of the participants showed any anaphylactic reaction or any emergency condition just after vaccination. Conclusion(s): Covaxin is a well-tolerated vaccine, and induces good humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 with a significant rise in the neutralising antibody titres. Copyright © 2022 Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. All rights reserved.

Hunting for COVID-19 vaccine.

COVID-19 disease is caused by a novel type of SARS-CoV-2 virus which was firstly described in Chinese Wuhan in December 2019. It is highly infectious disease manifested with fever, respiratory problems, muscle pains and tiredness. Up to now, no efficient medicine has been available, that is why research is focused on development of a vaccine. The vaccine research was launched immediately when the pandemic broke out. The main goal of vaccination against COVID-19 will be prevention of infection outbreak, prevention of reinfection, long-term protective effect and efficiency of vaccination in case of next potential waves of infection. The primary questions are if the effective vaccine against COVID-19 will be developed, how long it will take and who will be the first. The first pandemic disease caused by a novel SARS coronavirus emerged almost 20 years ago, the next MERS coronavirus disease 8 years ago and no effective vaccine against these diseases has been available so far. Presently, 179 candidate vaccines at minimum are at different stages of their development and 18 vaccines are at the stage of clinical evaluation. The surface S glycoprotein SARS-CoV-2 virus is considered the most promising vaccine antigen. Other options are the use of the whole virion or subunit S1 carrier. Currently, four types of potential vaccines have been developed. Whole virion vaccines (attenuated or killed vaccine) vector vaccines (most often using replicating or non-replicating viral vector) protein vaccines (subunit adjuvant vaccine or vaccine based on virus-like particles) and DNA, RNA vaccine. The key moment will be confirmation of the novel vaccine efficiency at the phase 3 of a clinical trial. Despite pressure and efforts to speed up the development of the vaccine, it is realistic to count on the possible vaccine in the year 2021 the earliest and the question is when it can be available in the Czech Republic. Copyright © 2020, Medakta s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

A global epidemiological analysis of COVID-19 vaccine types and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare messenger RNA (mRNA)-based and adenovirus-vectored vaccines (ADVVs) with inactivated virus vaccines (IVVs) using real-world aggregate data. METHODS: We performed longitudinal analyses of publicly accessible epidemiological, clinical, virological, vaccine-related, and other public health data from 41 eligible countries during the first half of 2021. The relationships between vaccination coverage and clinical outcomes were analyzed using repeated measures correlation analyses and mixed-effects modeling to adjust for potential mediating and confounding factors. RESULTS: Countries that used mRNA and/or ADVV (n = 31) vs IVV, among other vaccine types (n = 10), had different distributions of age (42.4 vs 33.9 years, respectively; P-value = 0.0006), gross domestic product per capita ($ 38,606 vs $ 20,422, respectively; P <0.0001), and population sizes (8,655,541 vs 5,139,162, respectively; P-value = 0.36). After adjustment for country differences, the stringency of nonpharmaceutical interventions, and dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant types, populations that received mRNA and/or ADVV had significantly lower rates of cases and deaths over time (P <0.001 for each analysis). Populations vaccinated with IVV, among others, had significantly higher rates of cases and deaths over time (P <0.05 for each analysis). CONCLUSION: The real-world effectiveness of IVV may be inferior to mRNA and/or ADVV, and prospective comparative studies are needed to critically evaluate the role of IVV in the context of contemporary SARS-CoV-2 variants.

NEW ONSET GRAVES' DISEASE AFTER SARS-CoV-2 VACCINATION

Introduction There is an increasing number of reports of thyroid dysfunction after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. We would like to report a case of new onset Graves' disease following vaccination with the adenovirus-vectored Vaxzevria (Oxford-AstraZeneca). METHODOLOGY A 29-year-old female with no prior history of endocrine or autoimmune diseases, presented with a week of palpitations, heat intolerance and excessive sweating three days after her second dose of Vaxzevria. She did not experience these symptoms after her first dose which she received two months earlier. Her father and sister have Graves' disease. She had a diffuse goiter with no orbitopathy. Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) was <0.01 mIU/L (normal range: 0.27-4.2) with a markedly elevated free T4 of >100 pmol/L (normal range: 12-22). TSH receptor antibody was positive at >40.00 IU/L (Normal range: <1.75). Ultrasonography revealed a hypervascular, diffusely enlarged goiter. She was started on oral carbimazole and propranolol. Five months later, her free T4 had normalized at 18 pmol/L though her TSH was still undetectable. To date, she remains hesitant for her booster dose. Results SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination have been associated with subacute thyroiditis and autoimmune thyroid disease. While there are reports of new onset Graves' disease after mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccines, it has not been associated with inactivated virus vaccines. The current prevailing theory is that the adjuvants in the vaccines can trigger an autoimmune event, also called 'autoimmune/ inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants' (ASIA). Conclusion Physicians need to be aware of thyroid dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially in those with a strong family history of autoimmune disease. Nevertheless, it is also important to note that the benefit of vaccination far outweighs this uncommon potential risk. More studies are required to establish a causal relationship.

Side Effects of COVID-19 Inactivated Virus vs. Adenoviral Vector Vaccines: Experience of Algerian Healthcare Workers.

Healthcare workers were prioritized in vaccination campaigns globally because they are exposed to the highest risk of contamination by SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluated the self-reported post-vaccination side effects of inactivated (BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac) and adenoviral vector-based (AZD1222, Gam-COVID-Vac and Ad26.COV2.S) vaccines among Algerian healthcare workers using a validated questionnaire. The final analysis included 721 healthcare workers, with a predominance of females (59.1%) and younger individuals 20-30 years old (39.4%). Less than half (49.1%) of the respondents reported at least one local side effect, while 53.8% reported at least one systemic side effect. These side effects were more prevalent among viral vector vaccinees than inactivated virus vaccinees. The most common local side effects were injection site pain (39%) and arm pain (25.4%), while fatigue (34.4%), fever (28.4%), headache (24.8%) and myalgia (22.7%) were the most prevalent systemic side effects. The side effects appeared earlier among inactivated virus vaccines recipients and generally lasted for 2 to 3 days for the two vaccinated groups. The risk factors associated with a higher prevalence of side effects included female gender, allergic individuals, individuals with regular medication, those who contracted the COVID-19 disease and those who received two doses for both inactivated and viral-based vaccines groups. Despite the higher prevalence of post-vaccination side effects among adenoviral vector vaccines recipients, both vaccines groups were equally effective in preventing symptomatic infections, and no life-threatening side effects were reported in either vaccine group.

DE NOVO GLOMERULONEPHRITIDES FOLLOWING BNT162B2 COVID-19 VACCINE: A CASE SERIES

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The development and massive use of mRNA COVID- 19 vaccine BNT162b2 has raised new concerns on triggering De novo immunemediated diseases, in particular rare diseases as glomerulonephritis (GN), even if the security profile is excellent and severe reactions have been rare. In literature few similar cases were recently described [1, 2]. We report six cases of newly diagnosed GN after a two-dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, from a single tertiary care institution in Northern Italy. METHOD: We described six cases of De novo GN occurring after massive use of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine from March 2021 to December 2021. All cases were biopsy proven. Baseline characteristics and laboratory findings, treatments and outcomes were based on review of medical records. RESULTS: From April 2021, we observed two IgA nephropathies (IgA-N), one membranous nephropathy (MN), one membranoprolipherative GN (MPGN), one acute interstitial nephritis (aTIN) and one minimal change disease (MCD). Of note, one IgA-N presented with diffuse purpura as in IgA-vasculitis. The median age at vaccination was 52.8 years (min-max 18-67) and three (50%) were female;arterial hypertension was the most common comorbidity (50%). Only one subject contracted COVID-19 before vaccine (16.6%). None of the points showed any sign of renal disease before vaccine;at the time of disease onset, the median creatinine was 1.49 mg/dL (min-max 0.6-10.5 mg/dL) and proteinuria 3.0 g/24 h (min-max 0.9-13.8 g/24 h). All cases presented after the second dose (1 day to 6 months thereafter) and three (50%) were within 3 weeks from the vaccine. Of note, the aTIN developed after the vaccine during a long-time therapy with statins and relapsed after a rechallenge with a statin few months later. All the nephropathies were treated as per center practice, with an overall good response (four partial remissions and one complete remission). Given a target population of about 100 000-200 000 residents in our area, we could estimate an incidence rate of 4-8 cases/100 000 patient-years. CONCLUSION: This small series has a lot of limitations including the small number of patients and we probably missed some cases in our area. Furthermore, we could not investigate a causal association, even if the timing of disease onset might be suspicious in three cases and the incidence seemed to be almost twice as the expected in Europe (about 2-4/100.000 patient-years). As for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, it is likely that the mRNA vaccine will result in a more potent inflammatory stimulus than the one observed after inactivated virus-vaccine: maybe some patients had already a subclinical GN and the vaccine constituted a flare leading to the full-blown disease [3].

Autoimmune conditions following mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) COVID-19 vaccination: A descriptive cohort study among 1.1 million vaccinated people in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding the autoimmune safety of COVID-19 vaccines may negatively impact vaccine uptake. We aimed to describe the incidence of autoimmune conditions following BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccination and compare these with age-standardized incidence rates in non-vaccinated individuals. METHODS: This is a descriptive cohort study conducted in public healthcare service settings. Territory-wide longitudinal electronic medical records of Hong Kong Hospital Authority users (≥16 years) were linked with COVID-19 vaccination records between February 23, 2021 and June 30, 2021. We classified participants into first/second dose BNT162b2 groups, first/second dose CoronaVac groups and non-vaccinated individuals for incidence comparison. The study outcomes include hospitalized autoimmune diseases (16 types of immune-mediated diseases across six body systems) within 28 days after first and second dose of vaccination. Age-standardized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson distribution. RESULTS: This study included around 3.9 million Hong Kong residents, of which 1,122,793 received at least one dose of vaccine (BNT162b2: 579,998; CoronaVac: 542,795), and 721,588 completed two doses (BNT162b2: 388,881; CoronaVac: 332,707). Within 28 days following vaccination, cumulative incidences for all autoimmune conditions were below 9 per 100,000 persons, for both vaccines and both doses. None of the age-standardized incidence rates were significantly higher than the non-vaccinated individuals, except for an observed increased incidence of hypersomnia following the first dose of BNT162b2 (standardized IRR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.10-1.94). CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune conditions requiring hospital care are rare following mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccination with similar incidence to non-vaccinated individuals. The association between first dose BNT162b2 vaccination and immune-related sleeping disorders requires further research. Population-based robust safety surveillance is essential to detect rare and unexpected vaccine safety events.

Kinetics of the Neutralizing and Spike SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies following the Sinovac Inactivated Virus Vaccine Compared to the Pfizer mRNA Vaccine in Singapore.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the early total spike antibody (S-Ab) and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses to two vaccines. METHODS: We studied 96 Pfizer and 34 Sinovac vaccinees over a 14-month period from January 2021 to February 2022. All vaccinees received three doses of one type of vaccine. Antibody levels (Roche Elecsys total S-Ab and the Snibe N-Ab) were tested 10 days after the first dose, 20 days after the second dose, and 20 days after the booster dose. RESULTS: At all time points, the mRNA vaccine generated higher S-Ab and N-Ab responses than the inactivated virus vaccine (S-Ab: first dose 2.48 vs. 0.4 BAU/mL, second dose 2174 vs. 98 BAU/mL, third dose 15,004 vs. 525 BAU/mL; N-Ab: first dose 0.05 vs. 0.02 µg/mL, second dose 3.48 vs. 0.38 µg/mL, third dose 19.8 vs. 0.89 µg/mL). mRNA vaccine recipients had a 6.2/22.2/28.6-fold higher S-Ab and 2.5/9.2/22.2-fold higher N-Ab response than inactivated virus vaccine recipients after the first/second/third inoculations, respectively. Mann-Whitney U analysis confirmed the significant difference in S-Ab and N-Ab titers between vaccination groups at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: The mRNA vaccines generated a more robust S-Ab and N-Ab response than the inactivated virus vaccine at all time points after the first, second, and third vaccinations.

A Comparative Study of Nine SARS-CoV-2 IgG Lateral Flow Assays Using Both Post-Infection and Post-Vaccination Samples.

BACKGROUND: Since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, lateral flow assays (LFA) detecting specific antibodies have entered the market in abundance. Despite being CE-IVD-labeled, the antigenic compounds of the assays are often unknown, the performance characteristics provided by the manufacturer are often incomplete, and the samples used to obtain the data are not detailed. OBJECTIVE: To perform a comparative evaluation of nine lateral flow assays to detect IgG responses against SARS-CoV-2. For the evaluation, a carefully designed serum panel containing post-infection samples and post-vaccination (both mRNA vaccine and inactivated virus vaccine) samples was used. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the assays overall ranged from 9 to 90.3% and the specificity ranged from 94.2 to 100%. Spike protein-containing assays performed generally better than the assays with only nucleocapsid protein. The sensitivity of some assays was higher on post-infection samples, while other assays had a higher sensitivity to post-vaccination samples. CONCLUSION: A comparative approach in the verification of LFAs with an adequately designed serum panel enabled the identification of the antigens used in the assays. Sensitivities differed between post-infection and post-vaccination samples, depending on the assays used. This demonstrates that the verification of assays must be performed with samples representative of the intended use of the assay.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Booster Vaccination by CoronaVac or BNT162b2 in Previously Two-Dose Inactivated Virus Vaccinated Individuals with Negative Neutralizing Antibody.

COVID-19 has swept across the globe since 2019 and repeated waves of infection have been caused by different variants of the original SARS-CoV-2 (wild type), with the Omicron and Delta variants having dominated recently. Vaccination is among the most important measures in the absence of widespread use of antivirals for prevention of morbidity and mortality. Inactivated virus vaccine has been abundantly used in many countries as the primary two-dose regimen. We aim to study the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac (three-dose inactivated virus vaccine) and the BNT162b2 (two-dose inactivated virus vaccine followed by an mRNA vaccine) booster. Both CoronaVac and BNT162b2 boosters are generally safe and have good immunogenicity against the wild type SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta variant with the majority having neutralizing antibodies (NAb) on day 30 and day 90. However, the BNT162b2 booster is associated with a much higher proportion of positive NAb against the Omicron variant. Only 8% of day 30 and day 90 samples post CoronaVac booster have NAb against the Omicron variant. In addition, more BNT162b2 booster recipients are having positive T-cell responses using interferon gamma release assay. In places using inactivated virus vaccine as the primary two-dose scheme, the heterologous mRNA vaccine booster is safe and more immunogenic against the Omicron variant and should be considered as a preferred option during the current outbreak.